Faculty Resources

“I am fully familiar with University Policies on Academic Honesty and understand that my professor in Brain & Behavior will enforce those policies, to the letter, as described in the Student Handbook...” (Professor Carlisle Skeen, PSYC 314)

“My signature indicates that I will exercise complete academic honesty (e.g. not sharing anything from this exam with others who may be taking some version of it or engaging in any form of cheating). I also acknowledge that any confirmed act of dishonesty will result in the disqualification of this exam and appropriate sanctions, including formal conduct charges and possible course failure.” (Professor Norma Gaines-Hanks, HDFS 235)

“On my honor, I pledge that I have neither given nor received help on this assignment” (University of Virginia)

“I pledge that I have neither received nor given unauthorized assistance during the completion of this work.” (University of Richmond)

“I have neither given nor received unauthorized assistance during the completion of this work.” (Virginia Tech)

“On my honor, I will maintain the highest standards of honesty, integrity and personal responsibility. This means I will not lie, cheat, or steal and as a member of this academic community, I am committed to creating an environment of respect and mutual trust.” (Christopher Newport University)

“I, (state your name), declare that the submitted work is original and adheres to all University policies and acknowledge the consequences that may result from a violation of those rules.”

“We, the people of this seminar, pledge to uphold the ideals of truth, honesty, morality, and individualism in order to promote academic honesty.”

“I pledge that the work I am submitting is of my own ideas and the work of others will be properly cited. It adheres to the University of Delaware’s Code of Conduct, and I am willing to accept the sanction for violating the Academic Honesty Policy. I will strive for excellence.”

“I pledge that my work is authentic, expressing original ideas. Furthermore, I pledge that I followed the University of Delaware’s Code of Conduct and adhere to the rules and guidelines by working independently.”

“I pledge that the submitted work abides by the guidelines set by the Code of Conduct and is my own thoughts and ideas. This includes proper citations, proofreading, studying, originality, integrity and honesty to the University and the individual professor’s standards.” 

“I pledge that this work was fully and wholly completed within the criteria established for academic integrity and represents my original production, unless otherwise cited.” 

A commonly used statement follows.

All students must be honest and forthright in their academic studies. To falsify the results of one’s research, to steal the words or ideas of another, to cheat on an assignment, or to allow or assist another to commit these acts corrupts the educational process. Students are expected to do their own work and neither give nor receive unauthorized assistance. Any violation of this standard must be reported to Community Standards & Conflict Resolution.

Some faculty include more specific information, such as examples of acceptable/unacceptable actions or suggesting the Writing Center as a resource.

Dr. John F. Jebb, Department of English
Any work that you submit to me at any stage of the writing process – thesis and outline, draft, bibliography, etc., through final version – must be your own; in addition, any words ideas, or data that you borrow from other people and include in your work must be properly documented. Failure to do either of these things is plagiarism. The University of Delaware protects the rights of all students by insisting that individual students act with integrity. Accordingly, the University severely penalizes plagiarism and other forms of academic dishonesty.

Dr. Clyde Moneyhun, Department of English
Every year, students who don’t think they will be caught are given failing grades for papers, given failing grades for courses, sometimes even suspended from the University. Even students who don’t intend to plagiarize but do it by mistake can suffer the consequences; the Office of Student Conduct doesn’t take ‘intent’ into account, only the fact of plagiarism. All this should convince you that UD takes plagiarism very seriously indeed.

Dr. Joseph A. Brady, Department of Business and Economics
Here are some practices that are acceptable:

Getting procedural advice from B&E lab consultants.
Discussing ideas about assignments with fellow students.
Showing a classmate how to do a computer procedure (or getting help with a procedure in this way).
Getting help from your instructor.
Modeling your code directly after examples I give you, or that are in course materials. Of course, doing all your work by yourself, without any help is acceptable.

Here are some practices that are not acceptable:

Copying (by whatever means) another student’s work or duplicating another student’s problem solving steps. This means it is not acceptable to do an assignment by having another student dictate the assignment’s keystrokes to you, or to let another student do things for you.
Submitting another student’s work, in whole or in part, as your own on an assignment or examination.
Copying (electronically or by hand) someone else’s computer file, modifying it, and handing it in as your own work.
Having someone load his/her assignment into the computer, then modifying it and handing it in as your own work.
Working with other students in unauthorized ways, in order to complete assignments; e.g., working in a team of 3, when teams of 2 are specified.
Working directly from someone else’s code or from their pseudocode.
Allowing another person to copy all or part of your work, to hand in as your own. Thus, you should not provide a paper or electronic copy of your work to classmates for them to use as a “reference” in doing their work. And you should not post your work to a web site or an electronic bulletin board, nor similar medium, for reference by others.

This list of unacceptable practices is not intended to be a complete enumeration of all the possible situations you could get yourself into; the list merely cites some examples of violations.

Dr. Clyde Moneyhun, Department of English
The writing center is an excellent resource. Expert writing tutors (faculty and graduate students) will meet with you one-on-one, for free, for an hour, as often as you like. You can take assignments before you even start writing for help with brainstorming; you can take rough drafts; you can take later drafts. You can set the agenda, telling the tutor exactly what kind of help you want. (The only thing tutors won’t do is ‘proofread’ and edit papers for you.) Sharing your writing as you work on it is the habit of a good writer. To make a free one-hour appointment with a Writing Center instructor, call 831-1168. Hours are M-F 9-12 and 1-5, M-W 6-9.

It is important to communicate behavioral expectations and address disruptive behaviors early on to establish a classroom environment that maximizes learning and growth. Suggestions for appropriate classroom behavior include:

• Questions and comments must be relevant to the topic at hand.
• You should be in your seat and ready to begin class on time.
• Packing up your belongings prior to the end of class is disruptive to others around you and to the instructor.
• Classroom discussion should be civilized and respectful to everyone and relevant to the topic we are discussing.
• Any discussion from class that continues on any listserv or class discussion list should adhere to these same rules and expectations.
• Any continued disruption will be reported to Community Standards & Conflict Resolution.

An example used by Dr. Joseph A. Brady, Department of Business and Economics is below.

Normal day-to-day social relations break down quickly without common courtesy. Common courtesy is an extremely important trait in the business world, a minimum requirement for getting and keeping most jobs. Using common courtesy in college is good practice for the real world,surely.The most basic idea is to not disrupt your classmates, or your instructor,during class. So, please avoid behavior like: habitually coming to class late; continuing fraternity or sorority (or other organizational) meetings during class times; passing around photos that document what you did on the weekend; maintaining steady conversation with neighbors during lecture or other class activities; taking (or making!) calls on your cell phone. My concern for common courtesy during class is a practical one. If you are(for example) talking out loud while I am trying to run a class, I will not be able to hear myself think. I’ll be hearing you talk. That is disruptive for me,and it makes my job harder. I seek to change the behavior of people who make my job harder. I claim the right to impose a seating chart on the class, or on a subset of the class, in order to promote common courtesy.[In addition, I can refer students to the Office of Student Conduct for disruptive classroom behavior.]

The Center for Teaching and Assessment of Learning offers details about how to handle disruptive behavior. Faculty referrals of students to the Center for Counseling and Student Development can be beneficial. When such interventions are not effective, faculty may contact CSCR at communitystandards@udel.edu.

At the start of a course, instructors should explain attendance expectations and how absences are to be communicated. Please consult the Faculty Handbook (Section 3.1.13) for details about various types of absences.

A policy example from Dr. Clyde Moneyhun, Department of English, follows.

You are expected to attend every class. If you must be absent, you are still responsible for the work due. If you know that you will be absent ahead of time, let me know, and make arrangements to get the work done ahead of time or to have it delivered to me on time. Consult the syllabus to see what is due to following the class, and call classmates to find out what went on during class. Excused absences must be confirmed in writing. For example, if serious illness, family emergencies, or other crises occur during the term, you should contact the Dean of your college (Arts and Sciences, Engineering, etc.) as soon as possible, [who] can assist you in notifying faculty and in validating for your [instructors] what has happened. If you have more than a few unexcused absences, I will meet with you to discus the situation. You should understand that your in-class grade will suffer as a result of unexcused absences, and of course your ability to do the work required in the course will also be impaired and grades on that work will naturally be lower.

• Review the material to ensure that there is sufficient support for a charge of academic dishonesty. You may wish to meet with the student to discuss your suspicion. Community Standards & Conflict Resolution (CSCR) staff are available to consult with faculty members on aspects of academic honesty violations.
• Email CSCR at communitystandards@udel.edu to determine the student’s disciplinary history and to identify the appropriate option for the case.
• Determine which resolution path you wish to pursue. Paths include informal resolution (as described in the Faculty Handbook) or formal resolution (as described in the Student Guide to University Policies).
  
• Choose an academic penalty. Refer to the academic honesty criteria chart for guidance. In addition, please consider:
  • How extensive is the problem?
  • How much is the assignment/exam worth?
  • Is it a major or minor assignment?
  • What does your syllabus say about how you will file cases of alleged academic honesty policy violations with CSCR?
  • What is your department’s policy/stance regarding academic dishonesty?
  • Do you need to consult with your supervisor/department chair?
  • Note that any student who has a prior history of academic dishonesty will be brought in under Option C.
• For cases involving multiple students, you may choose a different option and/or academic penalty for each student, depending on the extent of their involvement.
• It is recommended you inform the student that a case of academic dishonesty is pending. This may be done in person or via email. Let the student know that CSCR (or the Graduate College) will be in contact with the student with more information. You should not go into specifics about the incident nor allow the student to “argue” their case. You should continue to work with the student on other course-related assignments.
• Complete the academic honesty reporting form (formal or informal). Include a summary of the incident, names of those involved (charged students and witnesses) and the academic penalty chosen, keeping in mind the penalty may be different for each co-charged student.
• Submit all supporting documents for the case. Ideally, submit as part of completing the online reporting form, which allows multiple types of attachments. If your supporting document is larger than 5 GB, please send attachments via UD Dropbox. You should keep all original documents. All documents submitted will be shared with the charged student(s) but they will not be permitted to retain any. Please be cognizant of this and consider redacting any sensitive or personally identifiable information.
• If using Canvas, do not assign the grade (with penalty) for the assignment. Leave blank or assign a grade of “Incomplete” if possible. If near the end of the term, assign the student a course grade of “Incomplete” until the case is resolved.

A range of possible sanctions exist for cases of academic dishonesty. In addition to an academic penalty (determined by the faculty member), educational and administrative sanctions may also be applied, as determined by Community Standards & Conflict Resolution (CSCR).

A reasonable level of factual information must be provided in order to find a student responsible for academic dishonesty. The burden of responsibility for all policies contained in the Code of Conduct is preponderance, meaning it is more likely than not a violation occurred. The faculty member reporting the incident must demonstrate the student was academically dishonest.

It is contrary to University policy for a faculty member to lower a grade on an academic work or academic exercise when a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy is suspected without working with CSCR or the Graduate College. Such an independent action violates the student’s right to due process and leaves the faculty member vulnerable to a grade grievance.

Similarly, students are prohibited from proposing and/or entering into an agreement with a faculty member to receive any reduced grade on an academic exercise or in the course so as to avoid being charged with a violation of the Academic Honesty Policy.

Listed below is the range of possible sanctions. Students with past violations of the Academic Honesty Policy will be handled under Option C and in concert with other policies.

For all options, if a student participates in an administrative hearing or appeal, the academic penalty assigned as a result cannot be more stringent than penalty originally recommended by the faculty member.