UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, NUTRITION, AND EXERCISE SCIENCES
NTDT
321 - Quantity Food Production and Service
Syllabus - Fall, 2006
Instructor: Elizabeth M. Lieux, Ph.D., R.D.
-
303 C Willard Hall Building
-
(302) 831-2732
-
e-mail - lieux@udel.edu
-
Office hours by appointment: Thursday 11:00 to 4:30 - Call 831-8976 to
make an appointment
Where would you like to go in the syllabus?
Course description
Principles of quantity food production and delivery systems, menu planning
and purchasing, safety, sanitation and technical operations in a foodservice
system. (Prerequisites: NTDT 200 and NTDT 201)
Course Philosophy
It is my hope that you will enhance your skills as a critical thinker,
communicator, researcher and life-long learner as we progress together
through this course. I believe that learning is more than memorizing
information and answering questions on a test. It is using information
to gain an understanding of how things work and then to make them better.
A friend shared this grand defination of learning with me.
What is learning?
"Learning (is) a process that culminates in the ability:
-
to ask the right questions and frame good problems,
-
to acquire information and evaluate sources of information
-
to critically investigate and solve problems,
-
to make choices among many alternatives
-
to explain concepts to others (both verbally and in writing) and
-
to generalize to new situations."
Ganter SL & Kinder JS, editors. Targeting Institutional
Change: Quality Undergraduate Science Education for All Students. Targeting
Curricular Change: Reform in undergraduate education in science, math,
engineering, and technology. A report of the 1998 AAHE Conference on
Institutional Change. The American Association for Higher Education.
I hope that when you finish this course you will be able to say; "I have
learned how to learn and I have learned how to work effectively with team
members to solve problems."
Academic honesty
Method of Instruction:
This course is offered in a Problem-based Learning (PBL) format.
PBL is a highly regarded method of actively engaging interest in the material
to be learned. People who study using PBL are likely to learn more deeply
and remember the information for much longer than those who learn in lecture-based
courses.
Students will be placed in permanent learning groups that will work
on a series of problems related to Quantity Food Production and Service.
Students will develop a list of what they do not know for each problem
(the learning issues). They will prioritize the learning issues
and then assign them to the group members. Each member will research his
or her learning issue(s) and then teach the rest of the group what was
learned at the next class meeting. Learning will be assessed by several
methods: tests, exams, in-class discussion, oral reports, and write
ups of the problem.
Discussion of the learning issues among group members will occur during
the class period. The instructor or teaching assistant will sit-it with
the group, listen to the discussion, ask questions, and act as a resource.
It should not be necessary for groups to hold meetings outside of class.
Most discussion can occur during class sessions if each group member is
well-prepared and has done the assigned research.
Textbooks:
Required: Lieux, EM and Luoto P. Exploring Quantity
Food Production and Service Using Problems, 2nd ed. 2000. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
And: Payne-Palacio and Theis. Introduction to Foodservice,
10th
edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2005.
Or: Spears and Gregoire,
Foodservice Organizations, 5th
edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson-Prentice Hall, 2005.
Library and Electronic Resources:
There are readings available for each problem on reserve in Morris
Library. These readings may be accessed either by going to the reserve
reading room and requesting the desired readings OR using the electronic
course reserves. Electronic course reserves are only available if you
are using a computer with a udel.edu domain.
There are a wide variety of electronic resources available through the
Internet for most of the problems. These may be accessed by clicking on
the title. It is also recommended that you search the internet yourself
to find your own resources. It is important to use reliable
resources whether a published article or an Internet resource and to cite
them correctly in your reports.
Many students choose to use sources other than those made available
by the instructor. Care should be taken in choosing reliable resources.
Tips
for evaluating a World Wide Web Search
Worksheets
Worksheets are found in the required textbook (Lieux and Luoto,
Exploring
Quantity Food Production and Service through Problems). See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for due dates. Worksheets
will be checked for completeness by the teaching assistant and returned.
But the scores will not be entered into the gradebook until they are submitted
to the instructor. You may keep your worksheets until the final exam. But
they should be turned in then or you will receive no credit. Grading
is based on a three point scale of check plus, check, and check minus.
Testing:
Tests are scheduled to explore the material addressed in the
problems. See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for dates. Each test will
cover the material developed in the previous problem and the worksheet
which preceded that problem. Some of the questions will require knowledge
of the facts which should have been learned. Some of the questions
will ask for the use of critical thinking skills. You will be asked
to apply what you have learned to a new situation.
Tests will be graded but not returned. Each test is worth 10 points.
They may be reviewed during the instructor's office hours. See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for dates of tests. Each test
is divided into two parts. The first section is worth 7 points and is answered
individually. The second section is worth 3 points and is answered by the
group.
Grades will be posted in the classroom by random number. Each
student will be assigned a random number. You are encouraged to keep
your number confidential and not share it with other class members.
A final exam is scheduled during finals week. This test
will be cumulative and will cover all of the material of the course.
The final is a total of 60 points. You will have a choice of which
questions you wish to answer.
Write ups:
A report of most problems will be submitted by the reporter for each
group. This report will be carefully prepared and will include the learning
issues to be addressed, a discussion of each learning issue based on the
research and sharing of information by the group, and a list of references
consulted. The report should be well documented noting the source of each
assertion within the report. (See Lieux and Luoto for write up expectations.)
I expect each member of the group to make contributions to each write up
and to help the reporter by editing the written document. Write ups will
be graded and will be available for review. They will not be returned.
See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for due dates of write ups.
Each write up is worth 10 points.
For the problem entitled Thomas Jefferson two menu cycles will
be submitted and for Ray Kroc a production sheet and equipment specification
will be submitted as part of the write up.
Oral Reports
Two oral reports will be presented by each group. These reports are
to be professionally prepared and should include visual aids to enhance
the presentation. [If the group wishes to present the report using Power
Point, let the instructor know so a laptop computer can be available.]
Reports are limited in time (to be announced) and will be
presented
by the group reporter. A bibliography of resources consulted will be
submitted with each oral report. Each report is worth 10 points. See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for due dates of oral reports.
Early in the semester there is to be a report on the group name. Groups
are to name themselves. Possible names are foods, or microorganism which
cause food borne illness, or foodservice companies. Whatever name is chosen,
extensive research will be conducted on the topic. The group will prepare
a complete report on the name which will be presented by the reporter.
Towards the end of the semester the second oral report will be given
on "David Bedford". Each group will research one aspect of the problem
and the reporter will present the findings to the rest of the class.
When an oral report is required there will be no write-up.
Performance evaluations:
In most professional positions in dietetics, the practitioner is responsible
for managing other employees. In clinical positions those managed
may be clinical dietitians, dietetic technicians and dietetic assistants.
Community and management positions will have a variety of employees who
report to the registered dietitian. Developing performance evaluations
is a crucial component of managing the assigned staff and you need to learn
this skill before you are placed in a situation where you are asked to
evaluate your subordinates. Learning to evaluate the performance
of your peers in group work is a very good way to begin learning evaluation
skills. For this and other reasons you will be responsible for informal
and formal peer evaluations.
Members of each group will provide feedback to the rest of the group
at regular intervals to indicate how effectively the group is functioning.
There will be informal feedback each week to talk about how the
group is doing. You should discuss what the group is doing well to
increase learning and where the group needs to improve. Twice
during the semester you will complete a peer evaluation form about
the performance of each member of the group including yourself. The instructor
will also complete a performance evaluation at the end of the semester
about the effectiveness of each member of the group. Each evaluation
is 25 points. All of the formal evaluations are included in the final
class grade. See Tentative
schedule of classes and other activities for dates to submit peer evaluations.
Grading:
|
Source of Points
|
Points possible
|
| Write ups (drop 1) |
70
|
| Worksheets (drop 1) |
25
|
| Quizzes (drop 1) |
80
|
| Final exam |
60
|
| Peer evaluations (2) |
50
|
| Faculty evaluation |
25
|
| Oral reports |
20
|
| Total Points |
330
|
Final grades will be calculated based on an accumulation
of points.
|
A
|
A-
|
B+
|
B
|
B-
|
C+
|
C
|
C-
|
D+
|
D
|
D-
|
| 307 |
297 |
284 |
274 |
264 |
251 |
241 |
231 |
218 |
208 |
198 |
Go
to companion web page for problem resources
Top of page
Back to Dr. Betsy
Lieux's Homepage
Updated August, 2006.
Send comments to lieux@udel.edu
Copyright by Elizabeth M.Lieux, University of Delaware, 1997.