CISC 370 Grading Guidelines for Spring 2000
Give a careful assessment of your own project with comments to justify your grade on each aspect mentioned below. Your well-justified grade will be carefully considered when assigning the grade for your project. Unrealistic assessments will be a negative in assigning the final project grade. This grade sheet is due within 24 hours after making your presentation.
Name:
1. Presentation/Demo
Attributes to consider: preparedness, organization, oral presentation,
demo
2. Documentation
3. Code - is it well structed into classes that represent the natural objects of the application? Are the methods appropriate to the object being implemented? Are the methods and classes used the ones that were emphasized in the lectures? For example, is Java 2.0 code used instead of Java 1.1?
Is the code appropriately documented via inline comments plus more high-level documentation in the write-up?
4. Difficulty - is the overall difficulty of the project, easy, about right, ambitious?
5. Were the original objectives of the approved proposal met? If not, why not? Were they exceeded?
6. Strong points of the project
7. Weakness of the project
8. If your project was a team effort, what percentage of the effort did you contribute? To which components of the project did you make significant contributions? What was the contribution for each component?
9. Have consulted sources been carefully credited and precisely referenced? THIS IS IMPORTANT, especially references and credits to online code to that you used in any manner.
10. Overall assessment and grade
A = excellent B = above average (for this course) C = average (for this course) D = below average for this course F = unsatisfactory
I certify that the above has been completed accurately, completely, and truthfully.
--------------------------------------------Signed
This page has been accessed
times since 4 April 2000.
Corrections, suggestions and comments to Bob Caviness
Last updated May 13, 2000
Copyright
2000 B. F. Caviness